Origins: Board of Ordained Ministry
In February each year the Board of
Ordained Ministry examines candidates for Full Connection and Associate
Membership in the Annual Conference. It is a long process that involves
considerable research, writing and preparation on the part of the
candidates. It also involves a great deal of reading, evaluating and
preparing on the part of the Board prior to making recommendations for
approval, delay or denial.
It is most inspiring to see the seriousness with which the Board takes
its responsibility and the extent to which the candidates prepare for
the interviews. Those who are candidates for Full Connection are
evaluated based upon how the practice of ministry has influenced their
understanding of the church and its mission and message. The Board
considers the significance of the candidates’ call to ministry and the
candidates’ skills in preaching and teaching. This process of
evaluation did not begin with the Annual Conferences in North Carolina.
According to Wesley historian Luke Tyerman, John Wesley was concerned
about George Bell and his readiness for ministry. On November 24, 1762,
Wesley wrote: “Being determined to hear for myself, I stood where I
could hear and see, without being seen. George Bell prayed, in the
whole, pretty near an hour. His fervour of spirit I could not but
admire. I afterwards told him what I did not admire; namely, his
screaming, every now and then, in so strange a manner, that one could
scarce tell what he said; his thinking he had the miraculous
discernment of spirits; and his sharply condemning his opposers.”
The
London society was thrown into great confusion by George Bell and his
followers. Wesley chastised them for many of their actions. Among them
were not keeping the rules of the Society; having meetings at such a
time the people could not attend public worship; spending so much time
in meetings their work suffered; several people speaking and praying at
the same time; praying only to the Son of God, or more than to the
Father and their screaming in an unintelligible manner, and on and on.
Based on Tyerman’s report, I doubt that George Bell would be approved
today by the Board of Ordained Ministry. Clearly Wesley had concerns
for his manner and style of ministry and the results it had on his
parish. Chances are Mr. Bell would be given some suggestions for
improvements, perhaps some reading guides and maybe a preaching mentor.
I do know the Board would do everything it could to prepare him for
ministry.
Craven E. Williams
President
Greensboro College
|